?Tom with the latter being reluctant to

?Tom Walker and the Devil and The Devil and Daniel Webster have a range of similarities that go beyond the titles of the works. The characterization aspects of the two narratives are comparable, especially taking into account the devil’s character. In both narratives, the devil is portrayed is a powerful but selfish dealmaker who is ready to take advantage of people’s greed. In both narratives, the devil’s offer for the human characters is earthly riches in exchange for the soul. It is clear that both narratives’ portrayal of the devil is based on the portrayal of the devil in the Bible’s New Testament, whereby the devil offers to Christ all earthly possessions if the latter could bow to him. While there are other aspects of characterization that make the narratives similar, it is the common character’s traits that stand out the most.? Being folklores, the two narratives are also similar in the sense that they contain a lot of exaggeration. For example, in the Devil and Daniel Webster, the narrator talks of JabezStone seeing Miser Stephen’s soul in the devil’s pocket. Similarly, the narrator in Tom Walker and the Devil uses exaggeration to describe the relationship between Tom Walker and the devil following the death of Walker’s wife. It is suggested that Walker successfully regained the relationship of being acquaintances with the devil, with the latter being reluctant to renegotiate terms of handing Walker the treasure. The nature of this relationship is in an exaggeration.?In spite of the many similarities in the narratives, there are important differences that are worthy of pointing out. These differences mostly emerge in the plot, with each narrative being based off different perspectives. One of the most important differences is the origin of the riches in the narratives. In the Devil and Daniel Webster, the riches are generated from farm produce. Jabez Stone did not simply require luck to get rich, but he came to a contractual agreement with the devil so that he could farm profitably. On the other hand, Tom Walker’s riches were obtained from a buried treasure and all that he needed to do was to come to an agreement with the devil for him to be allowed to acquire the treasure. ?The narratives also differ in the setting. While the most important events in the Devil and Daniel Webster unfold in a civilized setting when Daniel Webster and the devil debate, the most important events in Tom Walker and the Devil unfold in a swamp where Tom Walker meets the devil and in the village where Walker became a moneylender. These settings are important to the narrative as the important details of the stories rely on location and the people who get to witness the events. ?The other difference and arguably the most important one is the lesson to be derived from each narrative. In Tom Walker and the Devil, valuable lessons are to be learned about greed. It is both Tom Walker and his wife’s greed that led them to the devil in the first place. The consequence for the wife’s greed is death as she tries to fight the devil over the treasures. Although Tom Walker enjoyed the riches for a while, he ends up losing everything as he is taken away by the devil and nothing of his legacy remains. Conversely, the important lesson to be derived from Daniel Webster and the Devil is the value of patriotism. Understanding the constitution and upholding the rule of law are important factors to the narrative and prove relevant in determining the outcome of the story.