The intent of this undertaking is to find the surface country of curiously molded objects like custodies and foliages. To make this, I tried to cut different sizes of squares ( like 3cm, 4cm, etc ) and happen each of its mass in gms utilizing an electronic graduated table. Using my collected information, I will do a spread secret plan with the country in cm2 on the y-axis and the mass in gms on the x-axis manually and electronically utilizing Graph 4.3. To happen the line of best tantrum, of both scatter secret plans, I will happen and compare the multitudes of the foliage and the manus. Then, I will gauge the entire surface country of the manus and foliage. I will besides experiment by placing the possible mistakes and solutions. Therefore, I will reason the experiment by happening out how scientists determine the surface country accurately and why it is of import for scientists to b able to find surface countries.

The tabular array below illustrates the consequences of the experiment I performed.

In the graph, the independent variable and the y-axis represent the country of the square in cm2 while the dependent variable and the x-axis represent the mass of the squares in gm. This shows that as the mass of the square increases, the country of the square increases excessively, doing a positive correlativity. The form of my graph is a positive correlativity without any unusual or unexpected characteristics because the countries of the squares are expected to increase as the mass of the square increases. In other words, the larger the country of the square cutout gets, the larger the mass gets. My theoretical account can work for both the values of ten and Y since my points is really near to the line of best tantrum.

The equation of my line of best tantrum I found without utilizing Graph 4.3 is y=35.7x+1.43. This shows that the incline of my line is 35.7 and represents the country of the square in cm2 per mass of the square in gms. However, the y-intercept is 1.43 and illustrates that this is an anomalousness since the y-intercept has to be 0.

To happen the incline and y-intercept utilizing the slope-intercept signifier, I tried to happen two places in the line of best tantrum that I can easy happen the co-ordinates of. For illustration, I used these two braces of co-ordinates to happen my equation: ( 2.2, 80 ) and ( 3.6, 130 ) .

Note that the existent equation is y=35.7142857142x+1.428571429 and the equation stated above is an estimation of 3 important figures. That would intend that the existent incline is 35.7142857142 and the existent y-intercept is 1.428571429.

The graph below shows the comparing of the line of best tantrum I found manually and the line of best tantrum utilizing Graph 4.3

As seen from the graph above, the arrested development theoretical account is y=36.210279x-0.099138263 and the estimated arrested development theoretical account in 3 important figures is y=36.2x+0.10. This means that the incline of the arrested development theoretical account is 36.210279 while the estimated incline in 3 important figures is 36.2 and the y-intercept of the arrested development theoretical account is -0.099138263 while the estimated y-intercept is -0.10.

Besides as seen from the graph above, the line of best tantrum I found manually and the line of best tantrum found utilizing Graph 4.3 closely lucifers while both closely passes through all the points of my graph.

To happen the country of the foliage which is the y-value, I foremost substituted the mass of the foliage which is the x-value to the equation of the line of best tantrum I found both manually and utilizing Graph 4.3. To happen the country of the manus cutout which is besides the y-value, I did the same thing except that the substituted sum is the mass of the manus cutout which is besides the x-value to the equation of the line of best tantrum I found both manually and utilizing Graph 4.3 alternatively of the mass of the foliage.

Let x=mass of foliage in gms

Let y=area of foliage in cm2

## Area utilizing the line of best tantrum found manually Area utilizing the line of best tantrum found utilizing Graph 4.3

y=35.71428571x + 1.428571429 y=36.210279x – 0.099138263

y=35.71428571 ( 0.84 ) + 1.428571429 y=36.210279 ( 0.84 ) – 0.099138263

y=31.42857143 y=29.42525173

y31.4 cm2 ( rounded to 3 important figures ) y29.4 cm2 ( rounded to 3 important figures )

Therefore, the country of the foliage utilizing the line of best tantrum found manually is about 31.4 cm2 while the country utilizing the line of best tantrum found utilizing Graph 4.3 is about 29.4 cm2.

Let x=mass of manus cutout in gms

Let y=area of manus cutout in cm2

## Area utilizing the line of best tantrum found manually Area utilizing the line of best tantrum found utilizing Graph 4.3

y=35.71428571x + 1.428571429 y=36.210279x – 0.099138263

y=35.71428571 ( 4.62 ) + 1.428571429 y=36.210279 ( 4.62 ) – 0.099138263

y=166.4285714 y=167.1923507

y166 cm2 ( rounded to 3 important figures ) y167 cm2 ( rounded to 3 important figures )

Therefore, the country of the manus cutout utilizing the line of best tantrum found manually is about 166.4 cm2 while the country of the manus cutout utilizing the line of best tantrum found utilizing Graph 4.3 is about 167.2 cm2.

There are some similarities and differences between the country of the foliage and the manus cutout. For illustration, both countries of the foliage and manus cutout have country differences between their countries found manually and utilizing Graph 4.3 of 1 cm2. The difference of the countries of the foliage and manus cutout is important by at least 130 cm2.

In order to happen the surface country of the foliage, I had to multiply the country by two since the foliage has two sides. That means that the surface country of the foliage is about in between 62.8 cm2 and 58.8 cm2 but I besides had to place the measuring of the surface country of the interior crease of the manus. To make this, I added half of the sum of one side of the manus before multiplying it by two. After making so, the entire surface country of the manus is about in between 498 cm2 and 501 cm2. I believe that the foliage has a more accurate estimate of the surface country since its breadth is a batch dilutant compared to the manus and the foliage has no interior creases.

Let y= come up country of the foliage

## Surface country utilizing line of best tantrum found manually Surface country utilizing line of best tantrum utilizing Graph 4.3

Area of leaf31.4 cm2 Area of leaf29.4 cm2

y31.42 y29.42

y62.8 cm2 y58.8 cm2

Therefore, the surface country of the foliage is about between 58.8 cm2 and 62.8 cm2

Let y=surface country of the manus

## Surface country utilizing line of best tantrum found manually Surface country utilizing line of best tantrum utilizing Graph 4.3

Area of manus cutout166 cm2 Area of manus cutout167 cm2

y166 y167

y62 cm2 y63.5 cm2

y166+62 y167+63.5

y228 cm2 y230.5 cm2

y2282 y230.52

y456 cm2 y461 cm2

Therefore, the surface country of the manus is about between 456 cm2 and 461 cm2

In this experiment, a batch of mistakes could hold taken topographic point.