Photodynamic Effects Of Porphyrin Derivatives On Bacteria Biology Essay

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy is a comparatively new option for the intervention of microbic pathogens. It uses light-sensitive molecules and seeable visible radiation to bring on oxidative harm to the pathogens. The usage of light-sensitive molecules could someday be used as a replacing to antibiotics or as an aid to them. This would hence cut down the sum of bacteriums turning a opposition to systemic drugs. Infections on the tegument would be a perfect mark for Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.

The taking cause of decease to patients who are admitted to hospital with a burn is a skin infection with 75 % being caused by S. Aureus and 25 % being caused by P. Aeruginosa. ( S. Banfi Et Al. 2006 ) The technique of utilizing photosensitizers has already shown to be effectual in the intervention of bacteriums in vitro that are immune to drugs. ( E. Alves Et Al. 2009 )

2.2 Photosensitizers

Different structured photosensitizers are known to demo different disinfectant effects and efficiency depending on if the bacterium contains a cell wall. Gram-positive bacteriums are less immune to photoinactivation than Gram-negative bacteriums due to the presence of the outer membrane bed or cell wall on the Gram-negative bacteriums. ( S. Banfi Et Al. 2006 ) In a type 1 photochemical reaction the photosensitizer reacts with the biomolecule and produces free groups. In a type 2 mechanism vest O is produced and is the chief constituent of cell inactivation. Both type 1 and type 2 mechanism occur at the same time and the sensitiser, substrate and nature of the medium determine the ratio between the two mechanisms. ( D. Caminos Et Al. 2005 ) The vest O of a type 2 reaction is available to respond with proteins, lipoids and nucleic acid which causes structural and functional harm finally taking to cell decease. Type 1 reactions produce Hydroxyl and superoxide groups which are straight linked to cell decease nevertheless it is thought that type 2 is the more of import reaction of photosensitizers. ( C. Moore Et Al. 2005 )

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Surveies have shown that Porphyrin derived functions can photosensitise the inactivation of pathogens ; these surveies showed that Gram-positive bacteriums were more likely to be photoinactivated by photosensitization than Gram-negative bacteriums. The extremely organized outer membrane construction of the Gram-negative bacterium intercepts the photogenerated reactive O species and prevents the interaction of photosensitizer with the cytoplasmatic membrane. ( D. Caminos Et Al. 2005 ) Photosensitizers are typically porphyrin or a phthalocanine derived function.

Photoinactivation of bacteriums under solar radiation has been possible in imbibing H2O. This means that the possible usage of photosensitizers could be expanded to H2O intervention systems. Impersonal photosensitizers are those which can non photoinactivate Gram-negative bacteriums. Porphyrin is a impersonal photosensitizer. Impersonal photosensitizers nevertheless have been shown to be effectual against Gram-negative bacteriums upon disposal aboard outer membrane interrupting agents. ( E. Alves Et Al. 2009 )

2.3 Porphyrins

The porphyrins used in this survey are Tetraphenylporphyrin and 6 derived functions of porphyrin.

2.3.1 Tetraphenylporphyrin

Figure 1.This survey used Tetraphenylporphyrin in all graphs and tabular arraies it is marked up as ‘TPP ‘ . The chemical expression for the Tetraphenylporphyrin used is C44H30N4 ( Figure 1. ) with the chemical weight being 614.74 g/mol

2.3.2 Porphyrin Derivative 1C: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

Figure 2.The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘1 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘1 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 1 used in this survey is C44H26Br4N4 ( Figure 2 ) with the weight of that expression being 930.32004g/mol. Figure 1 shows the location of the Br atoms.

2.3.3 Porphyrin Derivative 2

Degree centigrades: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

Figure 3.The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘2 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘2 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 2 used in this survey is C44H26Br4N4 ( Figure 3 ) with the weight of that expression being 930.32004g/mol. This porphyrin has a somewhat different chemical layout to derivative figure 1 as shown by figure 2 that the place of the Br is on a different C atom of each of the outer rings.

2.3.4 Porphyrin Derivative 3C: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

Figure 4.The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘3 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘3 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 3 used in this survey is C44H26Br4N4 ( Figure 4 ) with the weight of that expression being 930.32004g/mol. Similar to derivative 1 and 2 this porphyrin has bromine on a different C atom to porphyrins 1 and 2.

2.3.5 Porphyrin Derivative 4C: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

Figure 5.The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘4 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘4 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 4 used in this survey is C48H38N4O4 ( Figure 5 ) with the weight of that expression being 734.83972g/mol.

Degree centigrades: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

2.3.6 Porphyrin Derivative 5

Figure 6.

The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘5 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘5 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 5 used in this survey is C44H26CL4N4 ( Figure 6 ) with the weight of that expression being 752.51604g/mol.

Degree centigrades: UsersMattDesktopPorphyrin.bmp

2.3.7 Porphyrin Derivative 6

Figure 7.The porphyrin used for porphyrin derivate ‘6 ‘ is marked up in all tabular arraies and graphs as ‘6 ‘ . The molecular expression for porphyrin derivative 6 used in this survey is C48H38N4O8 ( Figure 7 ) with the weight of that expression being 798.83732g/mol.

2.3.8 Porphyrins as photosensitizers

Man-made meso-arylsubstituted porphyrins are a good topographic point to get down when planing a porphyrin as a photosensitizer as they are various. Ionic or not ionic chemicals can be positioned every bit along the tetrapyrrole pealing which changes the mutual opposition of the photosensitizer. Cationic porphyrins are said to be more active than anionic or non Attic against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. Cationic porphyrins have besides shown the ability to be able to demobilize bacteriums without any extra aid from membrane interrupting agents. ( S. Banfi 2006 ) Derived functions of porphyrin can photosensitise and demobilize many different pathogens. Cationic porphyrins are known to be able to demobilize gram negative bacteriums without a permeabilization agent. An electrostatic interaction is thought to happen due to the positive charges of the photosensitizer and the negatively charged sites of the outer country of Gram-negative bacteriums. ( D. Caminos Et Al. 2005 )

2.4 Reactive Oxygen Speciess

Originally Reactive O species were thought to merely be released by scavenger cells during a host defense mechanism function. They are now recognised to come from the NADPH oxidase composite as the primary beginning. Further research has suggested they are used in cellular signals. Reactive Oxygen Speciess are in a more reactive province than molecular O ; with the O being reduced. One of the primary Reactive Oxygen Species is superoxide ; this is formed by a one negatron decrease of molecular O. Hydrogen Peroxide is produced by a farther decrease of Oxygen and may happen spontaneously at a low pH. Hydrogen Peroxide can besides be catalysed by some enzymes which are the superoxide dismutase hence Hydrogen Peroxide is the most likely follow on from Superoxide formation. Hydroxyl groups may besides be produced ; these groups are extremely reactive and have a short half life and are expected to respond with the first molecule that is encountered. Superoxide may respond with azotic oxide within the organic structure which is another reactive molecule and signifiers peroxynitrite. Some cardinal signalling molecules are Reactive Oxygen species for illustration Hydrogen Peroxide whilst others are extremely damaging to the biological universe. The higher the concentration of the detrimental reactive O species the greater the harm that is caused to cells. If reactive O species are to be seen as a signalling molecule they must be produced by a cell and stimulated to be a signalling molecule and have an action in a cell ; whether it be the 1 that produced it or a neighbouring cell. They besides need to be removed so that you can turn off or change by reversal the signal. The reactive O species that matches the above are hydrogen peroxide and superoxide. ( J. Hancock Et Al. 2001 )

Antioxidants play an of import function by protecting beings from reactive O species produced by different cells and cellular compartments. They are found throughout the being and in different cells in different topographic points. They can be obtained through diet. They catalyze the reaction of Oxygen groups into H peroxide and O. They come from the household of metalloenzymes. ( L. Del Rio Et Al. ( May 2002 ) Ascorbic acid is the decreased signifier of the antioxidant Vitamin C with Dehydroascorbic acid being the oxidised signifier of ascorbic acid. ( P. David Et Al. ( 2002 )

2.5 Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacteria that is frequently found within the tegument vegetation. Around 20 % of the population of worlds carry staphylococcus aureus on their tegument. ( J. Kluytmans Et Al. 1997 ) 60 % are intermittent bearers and the staying 20 % ne’er carry the bacterium. ( T. Foster 2004 ) Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium that is non-flagellated that can do meningitis and sepsis. Recently Staphylococcus aureus has become immune to many strains of antibiotics and this strain is known as methicillin-resistant Stapylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus signifiers a biofilm on medical equipment and it is unknown whether it can distribute across a solid object. On soft agar it is known to distribute at 100 µM/min. ( C. Kaito and K. Sekimizu 2006 ) The strain of Stapylococcus aureus used in this survey is Stapylococcus aureus ( NCTC 6571 )

2.6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative rod that is motile and belonging to the household Pseudomonadaceae. Among the critically ailment and those admitted to intensive attention is it the chief cause of nosocomial infections. It is spread widely throughout the natural universe but is extremely concentrated in the infirmary environment this is due to the wards publicity of bacterial growing. Along with antibiotic opposition Pseudomonass aeruginosa can defy temperatures, high salt concentrations and antiseptics. The antimicrobic form of Pseudomonass aeruginosa varies between different geographical locations. ( K. Okon Et Al. 2010 )

The strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa used in this survey is Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( NCIMB 12649 )

2.7 DBPF

DBPF is besides known as 1,3-dipenylisobenzofuran is the most often used method for measuring the sum of Reactive O species produced. It is an Oxygen scavenging agent. ( M.Krieg 1993 ) Singlet Oxygen goes under a 1,4-addition to DBPF which produces endo-peroxide which is degraded at an ambient temperature to give o-dibenzoylbenzene. It is this chemical alteration which can be measured utilizing a spectrophotometer. ( J. Howard and G. Mendenhall 1975 )

2.8 Previous experimental procedures

2.9 Experimental purposes

This survey has two chief purposes these are:

Testing porphyrins for their ability to let go of reactive O species and mensurating how much is produced.

Testing porphyrins for their ability to kill bacteriums one time they have been photoactivated.

2.10 Hypothesis

Null Hypothesis: As the sum of reactive O species produced by the porphyrins increases the antibacterial consequence will non alter.

Alternate Hypothesis: As the sum of reactive O species produced by the porphyrins increases the antibacterial consequence will besides increase.

3. Methods

All methods were completed utilizing sterile technique

3.1 Bacterial growing

1. Nightlong civilizations of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were grown in alimentary stock and incubated for 24 hours at 37oC.

2. 1ml of each stock was transferred into 9ml of bacterial peptone H2O and a tenfold consecutive dilution was performed until 10-5 was achieved. This was done by reassigning 1ml of the antecedently added to peptone H2O into 9ml of a fresh peptone H2O 4 times after the stock transportation.

3. 0.1ml of each dilution was transferred to an suitably labelled food agar home base and spread equally on the surface so incubated for 24 hours at 37oC.

4. Consequences were gathered utilizing a home base counter.

3.2 Fixed porphyrin on the universal

Each of the 7 porphyrins was prepared based on their molecular weight to 1mM utilizing the expression: W ( g ) = M ( tungsten ) ten Vol ( cubic decimeter ) ten Conc. ( M )

10ml of trichloromethane was used

Tetraphenylporphyrin has a molecular weight of 614.74 g/mol

Therefore the weight required to do this 1mM was 0.0061g

2. Once all the derived functions had been prepared at 1mM concentration 0.1ml of each was pipetted into a cosmopolitan and left to vaporize the trichloromethane go forthing behind the porphyrin derived functions.

3. Broth was transferred into the universals incorporating the porphyrin

4. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas was transferred into 2 universals for each derived function.

5. One universal was incubated on the stirring brooder for 24 hours at 37oC in the dark and the other was incubated at the same temperature and clip under UV visible radiation.

6. A consecutive dilution was completed as mentioned in the Bacterial growing and each dilution was plated and incubated corresponding to the stirring brooder in visible radiation or dark for 24 hours at 37oC

7. Consequences were numbering utilizing the home base counter

8. A sample of each derived function was centrifuged and placed in the spectrophotometer at 5nm intervals between 200-650nm to see if any of the porphyrin had dissolved into the stock

3.3 Porphyrin mixed in the stock

1. The above porphyrin concentration was used.

2. 100ml of each derived function was added to 20ml of stock

3. The 2 bacteriums were transferred into the stock and incubated in the stirring brooder in UV visible radiation and darkness for 24 hours at 37oC

3.4 Porphyrin straight on the home base

1. Using the above samples of trichloromethane and porphyrin dilutions of 0.1mM ( 1 ten percent ) and 0.45mM ( 1 fifth ) this was done by adding 10ml of trichloromethane and 5ml of trichloromethane severally to the initial dilution

2. 0.01ml of all 3 dilution strengths of each derived function was pipetted onto alimentary agar 3 times per home base and allowed to vaporize the trichloromethane off. One was completed for visible radiation and one for dark

3. 0.1ml of Staphylococcus aureus was added to each home base and spread equally

4. 0.1ml of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was added to a repetition batch of home bases method points 1- 2 and spread equally

4. The home bases to be kept in the dark of both bacteriums were incubated in darkness the other half which were to be exposed to visible radiation had white light shone on them for 1 hr before being incubated in darkness at 37oC for 24 hours

3.5 Testing ROS production

1. A light box was created utilizing a GG475 cut-off filter. This blocks the wavelength of visible radiation that degrades DPBF but still allows the right wavelength that is required to trip the porphyrins.

2. 0.3ml DPBF ( 50µM ) and 1.7ml DMF were added to a cuvette and placed within the light box for 20 proceedingss with a lamp 30cm off. The cuvette was removed and so replaced before and after a reading with the spectrophotometer.

3. 0.3ml DBPF, 1.7ml DMF and 10µl of each porphyrin were added to a cuvette. This was repeated twice. One clip being left the spectrophotometer and being kept in darkness. The other was placed in the light box as mentioned above.

4. DMF dissolver was used to blank the spectrophotometer. Optical density ‘s were read at 410nm every 5 proceedingss.

3.6 Retesting porphyrin straight on the home base with DMF alternatively of Chloroform

1. 10µl of 10µM of each porphyrin derivative diluted in DMF alternatively of trichloromethane was added to the agar plates 3 times per home base and allowed to vaporize the DMF off. One home base was completed for visible radiation and one for dark.

2. 0.1ml of Staphylococcus aureus was added to each home base and spread equally

3. The home bases to be kept in the dark were incubated in darkness the other half which were to be exposed to visible radiation had white light shone on them for 1 hr before being incubated in darkness at 37oC for 24 hours

4. Consequences

4.1 Bacterial growing

Bacterias

Growth of bacteriums in Light ( Per 20ml stock )

Growth of bacteriums in Dark ( Per 20ml stock )

Staphylococcus aureus

0.00126

0.00075

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

0.00134

0.00081

Figure 8.

4.2 Bacterial growing with porphyrin fixed on universal

Porphyrin Derivative

staphylococci aureus

Pseudomonass aeruginosa

Control Light

0.00287

0.00288

Control Dark

0.00258

0.00218

TPP Light

0.00204

0

TPP Dark

0.00064

0.00276

1 Light

0.00066

0.00196

1 Dark

0.00133

0.00141

2 Light

0.00112

0.0002*

2 Dark

0.00276

0.001*

3 Light

0.00088

0.00052

3 Dark

0.00074

0.00117

4 Light

0.00216

0.00046

4 Dark

0.00125

0

5 Light

0.00045

0

5 Dark

0.00092

0.00053

6 Light

0.0009

0.00043

6 Dark

0.00236

0.035

All per 20ml of stock

* significance that these were the lone plates to demo consequences in the dilution series

Figure 9.

4.3 Bacterial growing with porphyrin added straight to broth

No growing nowadays

4.4 DBPF optical density

Time

DPBF visible radiation

0

0.980

5

0.980

10

0.975

15

0.970

20

0.973

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

4.5 Porphyrins in the dark

Time

TPP Dark

1 Dark

2 Dark

3 Dark

4 Dark

5 Dark

6 Dark

0

2.100

2.065

1.776

1.734

1.948

2.060

2.440

5

2.100

2.065

1.778

1.732

1.948

2.055

2.440

10

2.100

2.065

1.776

1.732

1.948

2.060

2.445

15

2.100

2.065

1.776

1.734

1.946

2.065

2.440

20

2.095

2.070

1.776

1.732

1.944

2.060

2.440

Figure 12.

Figure 13. Figure 14.

Figure 15. Figure 16.

Figure 17. Figure 18.

4.6 Porphyrins in the visible radiation

Time

TPP Light

1 Light

2 Light

3 Light

4 Light

5 Light

6 Light

0

2.100

2.065

1.778

1.734

1.948

2.065

2.450

5

1.762

1.854

1.700

1.496

1.478

1.874

2.265

10

1.576

1.618

1.578

1.298

1.222

1.668

2.205

15

1.446

1.438

1.468

1.112

1.174

1.562

2.190

20

1.402

1.396

1.332

0.979

1.104

1.524

2.185

Figure 19.

Figure 20. Figure 21.

Figure 22. Figure 23.

Figure 24. Figure 25.

Figure 26.

4.7 Bacterial growing after porphyrin photoactivation on the home bases Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Porphyrin Derivative

Staphylococcus aureus visible radiation

Staphylococcus aureus dark

Pseudomonas aeruginosa visible radiation

Pseudomonas aeruginosa dark

TPP

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

1

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

2

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

3

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

4

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

5

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

6

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

& A ; gt ; 300 Colonies

Figure 27.

4.8 Bacterial growing after porphyrin photoactivation on the home bases Staphylococcus aureus at a 1000th dilution

5. Discussion

5.1 Bacterial growing

5.2 Bacterial growing with porphyrin fixed on universal

5.3 Bacterial growing with porphyrin added straight to broth

5.4 DBPF optical density

5.5 Porphyrins in the dark

5.6 Porphyrins in the visible radiation

5.7 Bacterial growing after porphyrin photoactivation on the home bases Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

5.8 Bacterial growing after porphyrin photoactivation on the home bases Staphylococcus aureus at a 1000th dilution

6. Decision

8. Restrictions and future recommendations