Chemistry Eei Separating Mixture Biology Essay

To divide these mixtures it was appropriate to understand the physical and chemical constructions of all the substances situated within the mixture. After dividing these mixtures based on their physical and chemical belongingss ; it was so appropriate to compare their experimental multitudes compared to their existent multitudes. Once dividing these mixtures and comparing their multitudes it was of import to enter any disagreements which may hold been observed throughout the experiment.

Contentss

Background Information

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The mixture was composed of the undermentioned substances ;

5.5g sand

2.4g Fe fillings

25ml methylated liquors

13g of NaCl

0.6 g of Na sulfhate

13ml of hexane

The purpose of this experiment was to divide a mixture back into its original constituents based on the mixtures physical and chemical constituents.

A mixture is when two or more substances are combined by forceful agencies, such as pouring substances into a container. The molecules of the combined substances so mix with the others to make the signifiers of solutions, suspensions and colloids. These mixtures can be classified as homogeneous or heterogenous solutions. A heterogenous mixture contains unevenly distributed liquids, gases and atoms. The sand, Fe, and hexane are all non-miscible substances when mixed in the mixture, hence many unevenly distributed atoms and liquids are present in the mixture, therefore categorising the mixture as a heterogenous.

Mixtures normally do non dwell of chemical bonding between the substances, therefore leting the mixture to be separated utilizing simple methods of filtration. As the mixture contains sand, Fe, hexane and methylated liquors basic filtration can be applied based on each substances chemical and physical belongingss. However as NaCl and Na2S04 do undergo chemical reactions with the H2O nowadays in the mixture ; this creates a barrier for any type of filtration. It is hence appropriate to analyse the chemical and physical belongingss of each NaCl and Na2SO4, and happen an appropriate method to pull out both mixable substances from the mixture.

Therefore it is applicable to observe that substances are separated based on their chemical and physical belongingss. Therefore analysing the physical and chemical belongingss of each constituent situated in the mixture, appropriate separation techniques can be identified.

The most obvious dissociable substance situated in the mixture is Hexane. Hexane is oil, used for many necessities of life, such as cookery. As seen in figure 1, hexane has the chemical expression C6 H14 and it merely contains H and C atoms, therefore seting the dissolver into the class of an methane series ( hydrocarbon ) . Hexane ‘s chemical construction is dependent on its methane series belongingss ; its H ‘s are entirely linked by individual bonds to C, this is besides known as a covalent molecule. As the negatrons are being shared this creates similar charges for the H ‘s and C atoms. As both atoms negatrons have similar negative charges they repel each-other and make a non-polar substance. As non-polar substances are non-miscible in H2O, hexane will non blend in H2O as it ‘s a non-polar molecule. Alternatively of blending in H2O, hexane with a light denseness of 0.654g/ml will sit on top of the H2O as H2O has a heavier denseness of about.995g/ml.

Figure 1

In contrast to hexane, H2O is a polar molecule. The two O ‘s edge to the one H make a ‘V ‘ form with the H atoms. As seen in figure 2 it is noticeable that when H atoms bond with O, the H releases one of their negatrons to organize a covalent bond. Due to hydrogen ‘s negatrons being attracted to the positive negatron O, the two H ‘s become somewhat positively charged, and the O so becomes negatively charged. ( www.ozh2o.com, 2003 ) . The dissociation of the positive and negative charges produces a polar molecule.

Figure 2

Due to the above mentioned physical and chemical belongingss of hexane and H2O, the most efficient manner of dividing hexane from the mixture, will be the usage of pouring. And besides utilizing a separation funnel.

Decanting is the procedure of carefully pouring a lower denseness liquid off the top of another, such as hexane and H2O. It is poured into another beaker and so separated once more utilizing the separation funnel.

A separation funnel is used to easy and carefully drop by bead separate the heavier in denseness substance ( H2O ) .

Another substance that is present in the mixture that is besides mixable in H2O is sand. Sand besides known as Si dioxide has a chemical expression of Si02 and has a tetrahedral chemical construction, as seen in figure 3. Figure 3 clearly shows the four O ‘s environing the cardinal atom Si which creates a triangular molded construction ; hence the ground Si dioxide can be classified as a tetrahedral crystal. Out of all the silicon oxide crystallines, on mean merely two out of the four O ‘s of the Si04 are shared with others, giving the expression Si02 ( book mention ) . Due to sand sharing braces of negatrons between its atom it consists of holding an extended covalent chemical bond. Its extended covalent chemical bonding creates a strong bonding with the elements O and Si, therefore intending the chemical expression Si02 is a strong component. As sand has a difficult vitreous silica figure it is indissoluble with H2O, hence dividing sand from the mixture filtration can be used as it separates the liquids from the difficult solutions. Another solution that has a difficult like figure and is indissoluble to H2O that is in the mixtureFigure 3

( Britannica online wikipedia )

is iron fillings.

Iron fillings are composed of Fe or Fe. Iron fillings are a type of ferromagnetic stuff which can be easy attracted to a magnet. The negatrons revolving the Fe atom resemble a current, therefore this consequences in a little magnetic attraction to each single negatron ; this can be amplified by the spinning of the negatrons. This so means the bantam pieces of Fe can transform to a bantam saloon magnetic when a magnetic field is in country of them, therefore chainss opposite ends attract to the opposite terminals of a magnet. For illustration the north terminal of Fe would be attracted to the south terminal of the magnet. As Fe is besides a substance that is indissoluble in H2O the method filtration will be most effectual to divide the Fe from the mixture.

As Fe is already classified as a ferromagnetic metal, this means its sphere already consist of a high grade of magnetisation. However as seen in figure 4, when coming into contact with a magnetic field, the sphere become indiscriminately orientated. Besides when Fe comes into contact with a more modest magnetic field the sphere can go aligned in the way of the force.

Figure 4

As both sand and Fe fillings are indissoluble in H2O, they will drop to the underside of the mixture non holding a chemical reaction with any other substances. This deposit at the underside of the mixture can be separated first utilizing filtration as the sand and Fe will be trapped in the funnel paper. However to divide the sand from the Fe, utilizing a magnet will be appropriate as chainss domain will be attracted to the opposite terminal of the magnet, as seen earlier in figure 4.

As seen in figure 5 filtration is the usage of a funnel, funnel paper and a beaker. The beaker is used to catch the mixtures liquids and the funnel paper used to halt and absorb any all right deposit, in the instance of the experiment Fe and sand. Once the mixture is poured Figure5

Figure 6

through the funnel paper the sand and Fe will be left on the funnel paper and the mixture will be separated from the Fe and sand in the beaker.

It will so be appropriate to utilize a magnet to divide the Fe from the sand. However as the sand & A ; Fe will be wet, go forthing the assorted solution of sand and Fe to dry will be appropriate. Magnetic separation consists of utilizing a magnetic to pull the ferromagnetic metal Fe. As seen in figure 6, one time pulling the Fe from the sand, the Fe will be on the magnet and really difficult to divide from the magnet. Therefore utilizing glad wrap over the magnet the glad-wrap will be easy removed from the magnet as it is nonmagnetic and the Fe fillings would be easy poured onto a ticker glass.

Once generalizing the obvious and simple substances from the mixture, it is so appropriate to divide the methylated liquors. Methylated liquors besides known as ethyl alcohol is a intoxicant which consists of a certain per centum of methyl alcohol added to it to make a toxicants imbibing substance.

Methylated liquors is a polar molecule, its H ‘s, Cs and O ‘s all distribute positively and negatively charges, therefore making a polar molecule. As Methylated liquors is polar it is mixable in H2O. Therefore as it is mixable in H2O the group will happen filtering and pouring non an option to divide the methylated liquors from the H2O. Therefore the group will utilize fractional distillment. However it is appropriate to explicate why methylated liquors have a lower boiling point that Figure 7

Figure 9

H2O and this is all about the chemical construction of methylated liquors and H2O ( H20 ) .

Figure 8

Methylated liquors undergo a reaction to organize a H bond. As H bonds form between Hydrogen ‘s and a extremely negatively charged atom viz. , 0, F and N, methylated liquors fall into this class. Methylated liquors contain a H and a extremely negatively charged O atom, therefore the reaction of H bonding will happen, this is seen in figure 8.

Despite H2O is polar and besides mixable in methylated liquors ( metho ) it does non hold the same chemical construction as does methylated liquors. Water has a smaller construction and can continuously organize H bonds therefore heightening its molecular strength as metho does non go on organizing hydrogen bonds. This is shown in figure 9.

Both figure 8 and 9 show the difference between the H bonding of both metho and H20, it is apparent that H2O consists of really strong intermolecular forces as it is continuously forming, nevertheless metho has less chance for H bonding, therefore its formation in construction is weaker. Therefore it is apparent that the metho will necessitate less energy to deconstruct its chemical construction compared to H2O as it will necessitate more energy to breakdown its strong H bonding. Therefore based on this information it will be efficient to utilize fractional distillment as methylated liquors will be evaporated and be collected as the dilute.

Fractional distillment is the method of dividing mixtures into their original single constituents based on boiling the substance that is desiring to be found boiling point. Therefore a thermometer is used to mean the what the temperature of the mixture is boiling at and every bit shortly as it hits the boiling point of the substance wanting to be extrapolated, the gas so rises into a capacitor and the capacitor so condenses the gas back into a liquid, easy dripping the liquid back into its original signifier. As methylated liquors has a lower boiling point ( 70-80 grades ) than H2O ( 100 grades ) it will be appropriate to utilize the fractional distillment method to happen the sum of methylated liquors in the mixture.

Figure 10

Two substances that were left in the mixture were both sodium sulphate and Na chloride. Both these salts are soluble in H2O due to their chemical constructions.

Sodium chloride is good known as a rock salt ( stone salt ) , salt which is situated in the oceans and is more chemically known as an ionic compound. As seen in figure 11, its chemical construction is really strong as it consists of an ionic bonding.

The lattice construction of the ionic bonding between the two compounds creates a really strong chemical construction. In return this defines why Na has such a high boiling point of 1413 grades as the chemical construction needs tonss of energy to interrupt down the composing.

Sodium sulphate with the expression Na2SO, has an highly similer construction as sodium chlorFigure 11

ide. At its solid signifier Na sulphate forms a white crystal besides known as a salt. Its ionic construction really likewise to sodium chloride defines the ground why it besides has a high boiling point of ( … .. ) . Both sodium sulphate and Na chloride are soluble in H2O.

As H20 H2O is a polar molecule, in other words consists of uneven distribution of charges, the negatively charged O the terminal of the H2O is attracted to the positive Na ion in the salt. As seen in figure 12 the reaction shows the O extracts the lattice construction of in this instance Na chloride, nevertheless besides sodium sulphate. Therefore seting more H2O molecules environing the salt, enabling it to de-solve. ( Wiki answers.com, twelvemonth unknown ) .

NaCl ( s ) + H2O — – & gt ; Na+ ( aq ) +Cl- ( aq ) + H2O

Therefore no separation technique can be applied to either Na sulfhate or Na chloride as they are both salts and fade out in H2O. As they both are mixable in H2O and impossible to pour, filter, vaporize or utilize fractional distillment. Making one of the solutions to organize a indissoluble compound would be extremely affected and would so be able to filter out.

To divide the NaCl & A ; Na2SO4 from the mixture, it was apparent to utilize a ionic compound that reacted with an opposite charge, such as +cation attracts -anion. Therefore Barium Chloride chemical expression BaCl has two separate Attic charges Ba2+ and Cl- . These two ions are attracted to their antonym charges when coming into contact with them. This can be seen in the expression below.

When adding BaCl to the mixture the undermentioned reaction will happen.

BaCl2 + Na2SO4 — — — BaSo4 + 2Na+ CL-

The expression above represents the reaction of Barium and sulfate making a solid, whereas the Na and Cl are left by themselves every bit witnesss as they do non undergo a reaction.

This so creates a indissoluble solution which can be filtrated out utilizing the basic filtration method, as mentioned before sing sand and Fe.

Therefore analysing the chemical and physical constituents of each substance that is present in the mixture, it was apparent to what separation would be applicable to each substance ; this can be seen in the flow chart below. It was so hypothesized that based on these physical and chemical belongingss, each substance would be extrapolated giving a 5 % mistake scope for any errors made throughout the experiment.

Flow chart

This flow chart represents what method for each substance was used to divide it from the mixture.

Apparatus

Evaporating disc

Separation funnel

Filtration funnel

Filter paper

Boss clinch and Retort stand

Measuring cylinder

5 Beakers

0.6g of Sodium Sulphate ( Na2SO4 )

Atomic weight graduated tables

13ml of Vegetable Oil

Spatula

Barium Chloride ( BaCl2 )

1.3g of Sodium Chloride ( NaCl )

Glad Wrap

Electronic warming mantle

5 distillation-tube cartridge holders

Round underside flask

Condensing tubing

Thermometer

Base

Glass Rod

Distillation tubing

5.5g of Sand ( SiO2 )

2.4g of Iron fillings ( Fe )

Water ( H2O )

25ml of Methylated Spirits

-Magnet

Method

The mixture was poured into a beaker utilizing a stirring rod for more truth, dividing the hexane from the mixture.

The hexane was so put into a separation funnel with the mixture beaker under the pat, to recover any droplets of H2O that were still in the hexane. Thus the hexane was wholly separated from the mixture.

Filtration equipment was set up suitably ready for usage.

Sand & A ; Fe was poured through the filter paper ( *2 )

Beaker retrieved all the liquid, therefore dividing the Fe and sand.

Sand & A ; Fe put on ticker glass and left over dark to dry ; enabling separation.

Magnet covered in glad-wrap suitably separated Fe from sand.

Both Sand & A ; Fe were put on separate ticker spectacless.

Fractional distillment equipment set up suitably.

Heat box turned on to boil the methylated liquors.

Thermometer used to mean the boiling point of methylated liquors.

Methylated liquors boiled and evaporated.

Methylated liquors went through capacitor ; gas underwent a physical alteration back to the liquid ( methylated spirit ) .

Methylated liquors separated from mixture and placed in beaker.

Using computations the sum of BaCl that was needed to respond with Na2So4 was found

Using an electric deliberation machine an exact value of Barium was so added to the mixture incorporating NaCl and Na2S04.

BaSo4 became indissoluble in the mixture, therefore puting up the filtration equipment was needed.

Filtration set up for separation

BaS04 separated utilizing filtration with two funnel documents and a funnel.

BaS04 put on a ticker glass for drying.

NaCl and H2O was left in the mixture, therefore the usage of evaporating was used.

Electric warmer, a unit of ammunition bottom conelike flask, capacitor and tubings were set up to vaporize the H2O from the NaCl.

Water was placed into a separate beaker and so placed in the air drying country to vaporize any excess H2O, go forthing an accurate solution of NaCl.

Consequences

Table 1. Measured consequences

Solution

Actual mass

Experimental mass

Hexane

13ml

12ml

Methylated liquors

25ml

24ml

Sand

5.5g

4.92g

Iron

2.4

2.42g

NaCl

1.79

1.72g

Na2So4

0.6g

0.3g

BaSO4

0.86g

0.46g

Table 1 shows the exact sums of each substances initial weight and so each substances experimental mass.

Calculations

Discussion

This extended experimental probe determined whether a substance can be separated efficaciously based on its chemical and physical constituents, leting 5 % to go through as an accurate consequence. Therefore analysing the consequences in table into graphs will be most efficient to expose the information.

Graph 1 merely shows the solutions that are weighed in gms

Graph 1 compares existent mass to the experimental mass of lone gram solutions. It is apparent to observe that all the mixtures despite the outliers barium sulphate and Na sulphate are in an mistake scope of 5-10 % . The most accurate consequence was the Fe fillings ; 99.17 % of the Fe fillings were extrapolated from the mixture. The 2nd most efficient extrapolated information was the Na chloride with 96 % extrapolated. Sand was besides rather expeditiously extrapolated nevertheless merely 89.45 % was separated from the mixture. The two drastic outliers did nevertheless hold a major consequence on the hypotheses. As Ba sulphate & A ; Na sulphate had merely 50 % separated from the mixture.

Graph 2 nowadayss experimental mass V existent mass of solutions that were weighed in millilitres ( Ml )

Analyzing graph 2 it is appropriate to propose that the methods that were used to generalize methylated liquors and hexane may non hold been most appropriate as there was in both hexane and methylated liquors 1 milliliters losing ( 4 % ) . However despite this bantam difference it is acknowledgeable to propose that the techniques did work as 96 % of both hexane and methylated liquors was extrapolated from the mixture. Therefore the hypothesis was proven right as there was a 4 % mistake. However it is recommended that if the experiment was to be done once more different methods of separation may use to both hexane and methylated liquors.

It is hence appropriate to propose that the hypothesis was proven incorrect as the sand, Ba sulphate and Na sulphate all had more than a 5 % mistake scope. Many variable may hold caused the inaccurate consequences of all substances, as it must be noteworthy non one substance was to the full extrapolated to 100 % . Finding the right sum of each substance was highly of import as it so proved that mixtures can be separated based on their physical and chemical belongingss. The erroneous consequences create room for treatment into what may hold caused the different consequence. One major variable may be the usage of equipment.

Hexane was separated utilizing pouring with a stirring rod and manually pouring the oil into another container, nevertheless there was 1ml of hexane losing the ground to why may been defined as non plenty attention when titrating or possibly the whole techniques was incorrect itself. A more appropriate method of dividing oil from the mixture would be the usage of

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.oil-water-separator.net/separators-coalescing-theory.html